"Adrian Schmutzler" <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> writes: > But, based on the discussion here, the opposite has been identified as > superior solution (discussing nand subtarget): > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2184#discussion_r342136635
That's missing the point. Regulators are superior if there is controlling driver. E.g. https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt See arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-linksys.dtsi for a nice, OpenWrt relevant, example using this with a fixed regulator. If you don't link anything to the regulator, then I agree that you might as well use gpio-hog. But I still don't see how you can call that a superior solution. It doesn't suck more or less. I thought the ath79 conversion was all about using devicetree to document the boards ;-) Bjørn _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
