On 2019-10-27 18:44, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
This is a follow up patch on this discussion on the mailing list:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1041647/

This allows to activate PIE only for some packages where we thing it is
necessary and not only globally for all of them.

Hauke Mehrtens (6):
  buildsystem: Make PIE ASLR option tristate
  dnsmasq: Activate PIE by default
  dropbear: Activate PIE by default
  hostapd: Activate PIE by default
  uhttpd: Activate PIE by default
  lantiq: Allow PKG_ASLR_PIE for DSL and voice drivers

 config/Config-build.in                       | 22 ++++++++++++++++----
 include/hardening.mk                         |  9 +++++++-
 package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-adsl/Makefile      |  1 -
 package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-ifxos/Makefile     |  1 -
 package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-tapi/Makefile      |  1 -
 package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl-mei/Makefile  |  2 --
 package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/Makefile      |  1 -
 package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vmmc/Makefile      |  1 -
 package/network/config/ltq-vdsl-app/Makefile |  1 -
 package/network/services/dnsmasq/Makefile    |  1 +
 package/network/services/dropbear/Makefile   |  1 +
 package/network/services/hostapd/Makefile    |  1 +
 package/network/services/uhttpd/Makefile     |  1 +
 13 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

I think ASLRs value needs to be evaluated especially due to the performance penalty (hostapd mainly in that regard) and not to forget size increase depending on for how long OpenWrt intends to keep 8Mbyte devices around as 4Mbyte devices are more or less unsupported by now. It's probably a better idea to only enable it on aarch64 and x86-64 where size isn't as much of a concern and where it probably(?) receives most exposure to avoid uncessary breakage.

http://intx0x80.blogspot.com/2018/04/bypass-aslrnx-part-1.html
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=343964
Might also be worth taking into consideration.

Best regards,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to