On 5/31/19 2:06 AM, Sandeep Sheriker M wrote: > Hi, > This patch series contains > > 1. rework in creating sdcard images for different subtarget. > 2. creating a fit images. > 3. add support for sam9x5ek soc > 4. add uboot env file. > 5. bump uboot & at91bootstrap to latest versions > > > Sandeep Sheriker M (11): > uboot-at91: bump linux4sam_5.8 to linux4sam_6.0 > uboot-at91:add at91sam9x5ek soc > uboot-at91: changed som1 ek default defconfigs > uboot-at91: fix -Wformat-security > at91bootstrap: bump v3.8.10 to v3.8.12 > at91bootstrap: add support for at91sam9x5ek > at91bootstrap: add sama5d27_som1_eksd1_uboot as default defconfig > at91: move at91-sdcard command to sama5.mk > at91: add uboot environments > at91: create fit image > at91: create sdcard images for at91sam9x25 & at91sam9x25 boards.
I received this series 4 times, is it correct that the patches are all the same? > > package/boot/at91bootstrap/Makefile | 25 ++++++++++---- > package/boot/uboot-at91/Makefile | 25 +++++++++----- > .../patches/001-fix-Wformat-security.patch | 13 +++++++ > target/linux/at91/image/Makefile | 33 ++---------------- > target/linux/at91/image/sam9x.mk | 40 > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > target/linux/at91/image/sama5.mk | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++ > target/linux/at91/image/uboot-env.txt | 14 ++++++++ > 7 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 > package/boot/uboot-at91/patches/001-fix-Wformat-security.patch > create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/image/uboot-env.txt > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel