Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz> writes:
> Jeff Kletsky <l...@allycomm.com> [2019-05-20 20:42:16]:
>
>> Having spent quite a bit of time today thinking about the impact of
>> board-name changes, I can see use cases where the running system doesn't
>> know a priori what the range of acceptable tar-dir values are.
>
> Well it makes me wonder, why you just don't do following:
>
> platform_check_image() {
> return 0
> }
>
> As the image is already checked with fwtool_check_image metadata based check
> which should be probably good enough in order to lift any other additional
> checks. Of course, just in case your platform has enabled metadata checking,
> which in case of ath79 is true.
Doh! And the ramips target, which I've been messing with locally, did
that a long time ago. I just didn't notice. Guess I can just drop this
silently then. Sorry about the noise.
Bjørn
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
