Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz> wrote: > From: Liangbin Lian <jjm2...@gmail.com> > > Lua's LNUM patch currently doesn't parse properly certain > numbers as it's visible from the following simple tests. >
Tested-by: Karl Palsson <ka...@etactica.com> This makes some busted unit tests of ours pass for the first time on the openwrt target itself :) It will also mean we can drop some places where we use "0x40000000 * 2" instead of the more understandable 0x80000000 form :) (We've had problems with lnum and reading arrays of 16bit numbers into various 32bit singed/unsigned floating point forms in the past) Sincerely, Karl Palsson
OpenPGP-digital-signature.html
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel