Petr Štetiar  <yn...@true.cz> wrote:
> From: Liangbin Lian <jjm2...@gmail.com>
> 
> Lua's LNUM patch currently doesn't parse properly certain
> numbers as it's visible from the following simple tests.
> 


Tested-by: Karl Palsson <ka...@etactica.com>

This makes some busted unit tests of ours pass for the first time
on the openwrt target itself :) It will also mean we can drop
some places where we use "0x40000000 * 2" instead of the more
understandable 0x80000000 form :) (We've had problems with lnum
and reading arrays of 16bit numbers into various 32bit
singed/unsigned floating point forms in the past)

Sincerely,
Karl Palsson

Attachment: OpenPGP-digital-signature.html
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to