On 5/14/19 6:24 PM, Daniel Golle wrote: > I don't think adding formatter-information into the code makes sense > at this stage, as this is meant for exeptions from an otherwise applied > style. Here, obviously clang-format defintions don't reflect the > current style.
They don't, they reflect the kernels style (at lest, as much as I understand using the .clang-configuration file). If it's ugly, it's not a matter of clang-format but of the kernels code style, not? To not spam this list to much, I pushed two branches to GitHub with default style: clang-format-7 default: https://github.com/aparcar/procd/commit/ad7a052dad6f0f6a7e429dc3c7bac4206280aafd clang-format-9 default: https://github.com/aparcar/procd/commit/fca19bb9c0d14e7da80dd9248e4dc75eedee8dc7 I'd be happy if you could give this a few minutes and send a config you like: https://zed0.co.uk/clang-format-configurator/ Sunshine, Paul _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
