Hello Christian, On 20.04.19 20:59, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 3:45:52 PM CEST Adrian Schmutzler wrote: >> The identifier for both devices is "archer-c7" on ar71xx, set here: >> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh#L348 >> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh#L511 >> >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freif...@adrianschmutzler.de> >> --- >> target/linux/ath79/image/generic-tp-link.mk | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/image/generic-tp-link.mk >> b/target/linux/ath79/image/generic-tp-link.mk >> index 6853f12341..db1eabd420 100644 >> --- a/target/linux/ath79/image/generic-tp-link.mk >> +++ b/target/linux/ath79/image/generic-tp-link.mk >> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ define Device/tplink_archer-c7-v1 >> DEVICE_TITLE := TP-Link Archer C7 v1 >> DEVICE_PACKAGES := kmod-usb-core kmod-usb2 kmod-usb-ledtrig-usbport >> kmod-ath10k-ct ath10k-firmware-qca988x-ct >> TPLINK_HWID := 0x75000001 >> + SUPPORTED_DEVICES += archer-c7 >> endef >> TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_archer-c7-v1 >> >> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ define Device/tplink_archer-c7-v2 >> DEVICE_TITLE := TP-Link Archer C7 v2 >> DEVICE_PACKAGES := kmod-usb-core kmod-usb2 kmod-usb-ledtrig-usbport >> kmod-ath10k-ct ath10k-firmware-qca988x-ct >> TPLINK_HWID := 0xc7000002 >> + SUPPORTED_DEVICES += archer-c7 > In case of the v2, I think there's still the problem that a straight up > upgrade > from ar71xx to ath79 will affect the 5GHz ath10k wireless because it now has a > new device path and hence a new default configuration (where the card is > disabled) is created.
I recall upgrading my OCEDO Koala (which uses the same 9558/9880 combo) from ar71xx to ath79 and the PCIe path being consistent on both platforms. This however might have changed in the meantime, so someone should probably confirm this with a real C7. Best wishes David > > Tomasz Maciej Nowak worked on the WMAC part already (that's why the C7 v1 > hunk should be fine! But I think untested) in his series for the EPG5000. > <https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1056131/>. > > So I think that maybe it's possible to extend the migration script for > pcie devices as well. > > Cheers, > Christian > > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
