On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:59 AM Koen Vandeputte <koen.vandepu...@ncentric.com> wrote: > > > On 27.02.19 08:13, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > >> <snip> > > What I mean is just a p2p link running in AP-STA mode, I guess there is no > > difference for users. Am I missing something? > >
The design of the out-of-box firmware for AREDN, there are many end users that do not have IT skill set to change these settings at /etc/config level. Although, we could create high level UI setting options. The firmware is packaged so a "node" can boot live and will simply work extending the network with no previous coordination of config settings -- it can be in any logical network position: P2P, P2MP, MP2P, MP2MP. Adding such a setting of this network position could be a fallback option to consider, but not desirable. > >> Is dynack going to receive the late acks if I manage to run > >> wpa_supplicant (wpad-mini?) in plaintext or key_mgmt=NONE mode? > > What we really needs are authentication packets to trigger 'late acks' > > in ibss mode. I think wpa_supplicant in plaintext is enough but I am not > > 100% sure. > > @Koen: could you please confirm it? > > Will try to test it asap. > > Regards, > > Koen > I'm also working to test, but may not be for several days. wpa_supplicant would be required on both ends? dynack is dependent on ack's generated by wpa_supplicant? This is an upgrade issue of people using old and and new versions of the firmware at the same time across a larger network. Joe AE6XE _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
