пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 21:08, Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de>: > > So we both step back, same situation again ;-) > > I only just read the "Something like this for ar71xx, ath79 and ramips, > untested." in Dmitry's proposal, so I would do the following: > > Merge my patches, so we have the speed-up (without much code change) quickly. > > At some later point either Dmitry or I can/should take up a unified approach > and test it thoroughly. > > Best > > Adrian >
That was Petr Štetiar approach to unify. I was a bit concerned that I can't test it really well on multiple platforms, so I've sent the one I could. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On > > Behalf Of Dmitry Tunin > > Sent: Montag, 25. Februar 2019 19:01 > > To: Christian Lamparter <chunk...@gmail.com> > > Cc: Adrian Schmutzler <freif...@adrianschmutzler.de>; openwrt- > > de...@lists.openwrt.org > > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Speed up caldata/eeprom > > handling for ar71xx/ath79 > > > > I suggest Adrian's. I was too lazy to patch them all. Only merging > > this what matters. > > > > пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 20:27, Christian Lamparter <chunk...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Friday, February 22, 2019 7:52:37 PM CET Dmitry Tunin wrote: > > > > пт, 22 февр. 2019 г. в 21:48, Adrian Schmutzler > > <freif...@adrianschmutzler.de>: > > > > > > > > > > Based on the ipq40xx commit from chunkeey, I tried to do the same for > > > > > ar71xx/ath79. > > > > > > > > > I want to add that without this patch firmware extraction is not fast > > > > enough to get it in time after a flash. That's why wireless needs a > > > > restart. > > > > > > I have a question for you too. There are currently two competing patches > > > for the ath79 10-ath9k-eeprom extraction: > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/ > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1047062/ > > > > > > Now, Dmitry' was faster with his version, but Adrian's version > > > patches everything so which one should it be? > > > > > > (I'll write some more about the future of the extraction in the > > > other thread). > > > > > > Cheers > > > Christian > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openwrt-devel mailing list > > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
