On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:56 PM Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 09:17:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > + vsc: port@6 {
> > + reg = <6>;
> > + label = "cpu";
> > + ethernet = <&gmac1>;
> > + phy-mode = "rgmii";
> > + fixed-link {
> > + speed = <1000>;
> > + full-duplex;
> > + pause;
> > + };
So this DSA side is fine like so.
(...)
> > + ethernet@60000000 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + ethernet-port@0 {
> > + phy-mode = "rgmii";
> > + phy-handle = <&phy0>;
> > + };
> > + ethernet-port@1 {
> > + phy-mode = "rgmii";
> > + phy-handle = <&vsc>;
>
> This looks odd. The switch port is not a PHY. Normally you use a
> fixed-phy.
I tried some stuff but can't figure this out any other way that also
works :(
I guess you mean a fixed-link as the kernel has no references
to fixed-phy.
This works:
ethernet-port@1 {
phy-mode = "rgmii";
phy-handle = <&vsc>;
fixed-link {
speed = <1000>;
full-duplex;
pause;
};
};
Is it better? It is still using phy-handle... I couldn't find a way to live
without that. But maybe this was all you expected? phy-mode
and phy-handle still OK despite being named phy-something?
Or do you have some example of how it should look?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
