On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Mathias Kresin <d...@kresin.me> wrote: > 2017-10-24 16:59 GMT+02:00 Zoltan HERPAI <wigy...@uid0.hu>: >> Hi Jo, >> >> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> comments inline. >>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz <ka...@openwrt.org> >>> >>> >>> Given the fact that we explicitely wanted to avoid @openwrt.org mails >>> and that this was one of the discussion points leading to the split I >>> find it delicate to seal the merging commit with exactly such a S-o-b. >>> >>> Combined with ... >>> >>> $ git log --author "Imre Kaloz <ka...@openwrt.org>" --format=%cD -1 >>> Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:42:06 +0200 >>> >>> ... this looks to me like nothing was learned from past experiences and >>> that all that matters here is having the own name attached to the work >>> being done. >> >> >> LEDE does have patches in the tree s-o-b-ed and accepted like this dated >> January '17. (f24ffb901e0408917748773b883841eca52eea05) >> >> "*) email accounts >> - currently there are around ~20 active openwrt.org mail accounts (the 3 >> owrt devs would like to keep theirs active) >> - turn all the webmaster@, hostmaster@, ... accounts into aliases that >> anyone with voting rights can be subscribed to >> - ask those people that are no longer active to voluntarily give up their >> accounts >> - mail addresses may under no conditions be used for any personal business, >> consultancy, applying for jobs, ... purposes >> - any mail sent from an openwrt.org account needs to adhere the trademark >> policy and should only be used for FOSS purposes" >> >> In my view, this is FOSS purpose rather than anything else. > > Can't we just find some kind of gentleman/ladies agreement to not use > the mail addresses in public? I mean, I never got why these three > people insists on using their mail addresses for anything other than > receiving mail/as a forwarder. > > As soon as someone starts to use a @openwrt.org mail address, > basically all other are forced to do so as well. Otherwise the way it > comes across is N @openwrt.org core devs + X people committing as > well. Which I'm quite sure is what nobody wants to see. > > my two cents > Mathias I agree with Mathias can't we find a better consensus on the usage of the openwrt mail address ? Now it looks like 3 people officially represent the project next to the other developers; this will only cause friction in the future.
Hans > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
