Hi Zoltan, On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:40:56 +0200 Zoltan HERPAI <wigy...@uid0.hu> wrote:
> Daniel Golle wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:28:40PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > > > >> Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > >> > >>> I use kmod-ubi for creating a block device from the squasfs using > >>> module parameters as there is no busybox ubiblock applet yet. If > >>> ubi is made available as module so obvioulsy should ubifs. > >>> > >>> This completes the addition of kmod-fs-squashfs in commit > >>> 5163389b9c3b302a0d53df9a70294da5cbc08ada > >>> > >>> -- > >>> V2: kmod-ubifs -> kmod-fs-ubifs in commit message > >>> > >> Hi Ralph, > >> > >> With this configuration, these packages will try to get built on > >> targets where UBI support is not available, and failing those > >> builds due to the missing UBI config symbols. Can you try to make > >> these packages depend on the ubifs feature ? > >> > > > > Well, I reckon on most if not all targets with 'ubifs' feature set, > > UBI and UBIFS is built-in the kernel anyway... > > > True - there still are a couple config variables need to be taken > care of. > > -w- > Slipped my mind that there are config updates needed for targets not yet enabling ubi/ubifs. Will send a fixed series later. Thanks to you and Daniel for the review. Cheers Ralph _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
