Hello there. Could someone advise what is the right place to discuss this topic?
Thanks. 06.06.2016, 11:15, "Anton D. Kachalov" <mo...@yandex-team.ru>: > Hello. > > I'm trying to replace standard "lua" package with "luajit" from my repo: > > https://github.com/ya-mouse/openbmc-packages > > First I've tried to name package as "luajit" and add CONFLICTS:=lua (version > should be provided to conflict with) and PROVIDES:=lua variables like for RPM > to make a replacement package, but I get a dependency loop. Therefore, I name > produceable packages "lua" and "liblua". The problem is that I unable to > override default "lua" package from openwrt tree (it is not possible to > "uninstall", no effect of scripts/feeds uninstall ...). Only one possible way > is to remove "lua" directory from "package" dir and install own luajit pack > via "scripts/feeds install -p ... luajit". Does mainstream package directory > has a feed name while it is not separate from build tree like an extra > openwrt/packages repo and other 3rd party repos? It could be fair to have an > ability to override core packages with "scripts/feeds install". > > I'm going to use LuaJIT on our BMCs (ARM Aspeed SoC) as a HTTP API backend. > Nginx compiled with LuaJIT takes about 220 RPS on dynamic content (reading > one value from i2c bus at each call). With auth checking (and caching result > of auth via ubus for 1min at Nginx site via shared dict) I've got 200 RPS (9% > drop). For reference, static pages serves by Nginx at 330 RPS. Simple > micropython http server takes 40 RPS. LUCI + uhttpd is dramatically slow (2-4 > RPS) even with LuaJIT cause at each request there are a lot and a lot of file > access. Current LuCI modules are not compatible with Nginx (there are a lot > of global vars read & write). So, as a replacement for IPMI proto calls we > would prefer to use RPC calls (REST-like) made separately from LUCI eco > system. We leave LUCI for Web configuration staff only. > > Also I found a little complicated to add more authentication methods (like > AD, LD, Radius, O-Auth and so on). It's a little tricky, but possible. I made > O-Auth like http requester to our auth center. For HTTP-RPC module it should > be done as duplicate code. > > Another problem that I've faced is an access from Nginx to ubus (nginx runs > under "nobody"). I'm able to send requests, but get an empty response. Only > Nginx running under root lead to receive a proper answers. Socket file has > enough permissions. What is the proper way to configure ubus to allow nginx > process to make requests to ubus? > > PS. The script to install targets from a specific feed do not proceed with > "-a" option. The command "scripts/feeds install -a -p openbmc_target" will > not install all targets. Only explicit add works: "scipts/feeds -p > openbmc_target TARGET_NAME". Why dash isn't allowed in feed's name, but for > packages it's fine? E.g. "src-git openbmc-target > https://github.com/ya-mouse/openbmc-target.git"; doesn't work. Need to specify > "src-git openbmc_target ...". > > Thank you in advance! > > -- > Anton D. Kachalov _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
