John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > > > On 23/05/2016 20:12, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > Hi John, > > John Crispin wrote, > > > >> Hi, > >> is it really a gnu extension or is uclibc b0rked for these symbols ? > > > > I think it isn't b0rked. > > It was added for ARM GNU libc here under #ifdef __USE_GNU: > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blobdiff;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/bits/fcntl.h;h=aa2d36ca80f0ca4c5793b28b3852ce60b5fe57ef;hp=6a5f89ad1f8bdf8a825fc1e55a84679a86349a6c;hb=adb252daea96e7e160553703d477b76ff6a7781e;hpb=01b5049d107460f5eca797eda983958d1a410ffd > > > > And later moved to generic fcntl.h file. So we are correct here or > > at least compatible to GNU libc. > > > > best regards > > Waldemar > > > > ok, i'll merge it later today or in the morning >
This still doesn't work on the uclibc in openwrt-CC branch. The O_PATH definitions are in asm-generic/fcntl.h, which can be included via linux/fcntl.h, _GNU_SOURCE doesn't get this pulled in though. I attempted to add includes for linux/fcntl, but it just gives me redeclaration errors for struct flock. Cheers, Karl P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
