On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <bro...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> I've created a OpenWRT ticket[1] on this issue, as it seems that someone[2] >> closed Felix'es OpenWRT email account (bad choice! emails bouncing). >> Sounds like OpenWRT and the LEDE https://www.lede-project.org/ project >> is in some kind of conflict. >> >> OpenWRT ticket [1] https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/22349 >> >> [2] >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.embedded.openwrt.devel/40298/focus=40335 > > OK, so, after porting the patch to 4.1 openwrt kernel and playing a > bit with fq_codel limits I was able to get 420Mbps UDP like this: > tc qdisc replace dev wlan0 parent :1 fq_codel flows 16 limit 256
Forgot to mention, I've reduced drop_batch_size down to 32 > This is certainly better than 30Mbps but still more than two times > less than before (900). > TCP also improved a little (550 to ~590). > > Felix, others, do you want to see the ported patch, maybe I did something > wrong? > Doesn't look like it will save ath10k from performance regression. > >> >> On Fri, 6 May 2016 11:42:43 +0200 >> Jesper Dangaard Brouer <bro...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Felix, >>> >>> This is an important fix for OpenWRT, please read! >>> >>> OpenWRT changed the default fq_codel sch->limit from 10240 to 1024, >>> without also adjusting q->flows_cnt. Eric explains below that you must >>> also adjust the buckets (q->flows_cnt) for this not to break. (Just >>> adjust it to 128) >>> >>> Problematic OpenWRT commit in question: >>> http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=patch;h=12cd6578084e >>> 12cd6578084e ("kernel: revert fq_codel quantum override to prevent it from >>> causing too much cpu load with higher speed (#21326)") >>> >>> >>> I also highly recommend you cherry-pick this very recent commit: >>> net-next: 9d18562a2278 ("fq_codel: add batch ability to fq_codel_drop()") >>> https://git.kernel.org/davem/net-next/c/9d18562a227 >>> >>> This should fix very high CPU usage in-case fq_codel goes into drop mode. >>> The problem is that drop mode was considered rare, and implementation >>> wise it was chosen to be more expensive (to save cycles on normal mode). >>> Unfortunately is it easy to trigger with an UDP flood. Drop mode is >>> especially expensive for smaller devices, as it scans a 4K big array, >>> thus 64 cache misses for small devices! >>> >>> The fix is to allow drop-mode to bulk-drop more packets when entering >>> drop-mode (default 64 bulk drop). That way we don't suddenly >>> experience a significantly higher processing cost per packet, but >>> instead can amortize this. >>> >>> To Eric, should we recommend OpenWRT to adjust default (max) 64 bulk >>> drop, given we also recommend bucket size to be 128 ? (thus the amount >>> of memory to scan is less, but their CPU is also much smaller). >>> >>> --Jesper >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 05 May 2016 12:23:27 -0700 Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 19:25 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote: >>> > > On 5 May 2016 at 19:12, Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > > On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 17:53 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> qdisc fq_codel 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 limit 1024p flows 1024 >>> > > >> quantum 1514 target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn >>> > > >> Sent 12306 bytes 128 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) >>> > > >> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 >>> > > >> maxpacket 0 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 0 ecn_mark 0 >>> > > >> new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0 >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Limit of 1024 packets and 1024 flows is not wise I think. >>> > > > >>> > > > (If all buckets are in use, each bucket has a virtual queue of 1 >>> > > > packet, >>> > > > which is almost the same than having no queue at all) >>> > > > >>> > > > I suggest to have at least 8 packets per bucket, to let Codel have a >>> > > > chance to trigger. >>> > > > >>> > > > So you could either reduce number of buckets to 128 (if memory is >>> > > > tight), or increase limit to 8192. >>> > > >>> > > Will try, but what I've posted is default, I didn't change/configure >>> > > that. >>> > >>> > fq_codel has a default of 10240 packets and 1024 buckets. >>> > >>> > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c#L413 >>> > >>> > If someone changed that in the linux variant you use, he probably should >>> > explain the rationale. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Jesper Dangaard Brouer >> MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat >> Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
