Thanks Daniel. That explains a lot. I imagine if some digging is done it would be possible to find the holders of the critical resources and then re-organize it from scratch within the OpenWrt Project. But as the fork has already happened there is no much point in doing that.
Regards, Fernando On 4 May 2016 at 21:05, Daniel Dickinson <open...@daniel.thecshore.com> wrote: > On 16-05-04 07:59 PM, Fernando Frediani wrote: > > Just curious to know by the names that signed the announcement of the > > new project being know OpenWrt Developers why weren't there enough votes > > inside OpenWrt to do this reboot and reorganize it completely under the > > LEDE Project ideas ? > > I don't know if there is a project charter, but from when I was > developer (I step aside because I was having personal issues not openwrt > related) I wasn't aware of an actual voting mechanism or constitution > that said majority rules. I'm not sure that there is an actual > democratic method of decision making in the current framework. > > Regards, > > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
