The only thing that seems to improve from my perspective is normal git pull requests instead of antiquated email patches. The name change and that 90's style website will only confuse the users.
> Am 04.05.2016 um 00:50 schrieb Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@gmail.com>: > >> On 3 May 2016 at 23:19, Bruno Randolf <b...@einfach.org> wrote: >>> On 03/05/16 18:59, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >>> we'd like to introduce LEDE, a reboot of the OpenWrt community >>> ... >>> Jo-Philipp Wich, >>> John Crispin, >>> Daniel Golle, >>> Felix Fietkau, >>> Hauke Mehrtens >>> John Crispin >>> Matthias Schiffer, >>> Steven Barth >> >> While a fresh start and a more open process is good move, given this >> list of supporters it sounds a bit ridiculous... who is left in the >> OpenWRT boat and why not do it as OpenWRT (V2 or whatever)??? > > Indeed. Looks like silent rebranding. Without public discussion of the > issues (and possible ways to fix them) in mailing list Same people, > rules and methods. > Could you elaborate more and explain how exactly LEDE is going to fix > the listed problems? And why it's not possible to fix them inside > existing project? > > > Regards, > Roman > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
