On 04/21/2016 11:30 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 21 April 2016 at 08:33, Matthias Schiffer
> <mschif...@universe-factory.net> wrote:
>> @@ -967,8 +968,8 @@ define Device/tl-wr2543-v1
>>      BOARDNAME := TL-WR2543N
>>      DEVICE_PROFILE := TLWR2543
>>      TPLINK_HWID := 0x25430001
>> -    IMAGE/sysupgrade.bin := append-rootfs | mktplinkfw sysupgrade "-v 
>> 3.13.99"
>> -    IMAGE/factory.bin := append-rootfs | mktplinkfw factory "-v 3.13.99"
>> +    IMAGE/sysupgrade.bin := append-rootfs | mktplinkfw sysupgrade -v 3.13.99
>> +    IMAGE/factory.bin := append-rootfs | mktplinkfw factory -v 3.13.99
>>  endef
>>  TARGET_DEVICES += tl-wr2543-v1
> 
> Any idea why we don't use variables in the first place? E.g.
> VERSION := 3.13.99
> 

For the version, this would make sense, but can be done in a separate
patch. For the region code, we will eventually need to build multiple
factory images with different arguments, so in that case, using additional
arguments for the mktplinkfw build step makes sense.

Matthias

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to