Sorry, yeah, must have missed that! Thanks!
On 2016-02-16 16:24, John Crispin wrote: > > > > > > > > On 16/02/2016 16:00, Joseph C. Lehner wrote: >> I've received a notification from patchwork that the patch status has >> been changed to "Accepted" 9 days ago, but it hasn't been merged yet. >> >> Since I have another patch depending on v4, should I submit v5, or wait >> until v4 has been merged and then submit a new patch? >> >> Regards >> Joseph >> > > > > this one ? > > commit 8f9e1937a3c716f0da1a2ec22e26e18e4ec338f4 > Author: blogic <blogic@3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73> > Date: Fri Feb 12 08:29:33 2016 +0000 > > ramips: Add support for Netgear EX2700 > > This patch adds support for the Netgear EX2700 and builds an approriate > sysupgrade image. > > What's missing is the option to build a factory image flashable via the > router's stock web interface, but this approach is hindered by the fact > that u-boot operforms an additional integrity check, which expects a > uImage header in the last 64 bytes of the "kernel" partition, which > the bootloader expects to be 960k, a size exceeded by the standard > OpenWrt kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Joseph C. Lehner <joseph.c.leh...@gmail.com> > > git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@48698 > 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73 > > i pushed it earlier today already by the look of things > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
