Hi,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Martin Blumenstingl
<martin.blumensti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I'm wondering if we should add the dsl-vrx200-firmware-xdsl-{a,b}
> firmware as package to each device, depending on which firmware (Annex
> A or B) the device is originally shipped with.
> The question that comes up in that case is: what do we do with
> TD-W8970 (and similar devices) where there's a version for Germany and
> another one for non-German market.
yeah, I wondered about that too.
Currently there's one release valid for both annex variants with no
dsl firmware at all. Adding both blobs to that is probably out if the
question due to its size.
John mentioned an existing mechanism to ship B per default with an
optional patch on to top to morph it into A, iiuc [0]. That might
work, I haven't looked into it.
>From an end users' perspective having one distinct release per annex
variant sounds more attractive, as the hardware is marked as such and
an openwrt release with a matching name would be less confusing.
Regards,
Andre
[0] https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2015-November/037470.html
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
