Hello, Sorry for my late input.
I'd been considering starting a funded, but non-profit fork with close upstream collaboration just for the above reasons and for reasons even beyond that. I'm delighted that others came to a similar conclusion. Start seems probable (early?) next year. I welcome any input relating to this topic. Regards, bkil On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Bastian Bittorf <bitt...@bluebottle.com> wrote: > * Daniel Golle <dan...@makrotopia.org> [13.10.2015 16:53]: >> If you want an industry-driven fork, go ahead. But don't force that >> model upon an existing community without understanding how major parts >> of that said community is operating. > > What I see since a long time, is that there is simply not > enough manpower for reviewing patches and "simple" maintainance > work (trac, buildbots) and this more and more leads to an unhappy > community and overloaded devs. > > commercial pressure is'nt good, i agree - but maybe there is > a way to have at least 1 fulltime or 2 parttime devs. > > bye, bastian > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
