On 23/11/2015 13:12, Etienne Champetier wrote: > Hey, > > 2015-11-23 12:52 GMT+01:00 Paul Fertser <fercer...@gmail.com > <mailto:fercer...@gmail.com>>: > > Hey Etienne, > > Etienne Champetier <champetier.etie...@gmail.com > <mailto:champetier.etie...@gmail.com>> writes: > > i know that spawn_jail(void) is valid code, but then the clone call > > refuses to compile > > That's type-safety for you. spawn_jail() is valid code too but it's not > type-safe, so AFAICT you're avoiding the errors by letting the compiler > ignore them, not by providing a proper solution. :) > > > clone really want a function like "int fn(void * arg)" > > Is > > /static int spawn_jail(void * _notused)/ > > ok for you both? > > Etienne
that would be valid code that does not ignore type safety checks. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
