On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Felix Fietkau <n...@openwrt.org> wrote:
> On 2015-09-17 15:05, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > > From: Alexandru Ardelean <a...@ocedo.com> > > > > The idea is that we may only need the libnl core, > > or libnl-route or libnl-nf libs, but maybe not all of them. > > > > This way we can select which ones we need without bloating the > > firmware image too much. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleana...@gmail.com> > Maybe it would be better to have libnl as a metapackage selecting > libnl-core + the other ones. The way you split the package, you might be > breaking some packages that depend on it. > > Or did you review all of the packages to ensure that they only need the > core? > > - Felix > Good point. I only took a look at base packages. Looking through the packages feed, there's keepalived , ibrcommon, kismet, bmon and aircrack-ng that depend on libnl. Other feeds don't have libnl deps. I'll check if libnl is sufficient and if not, implement your suggestion. Thanks
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
