On 16/09/15 05:08, openwrt-comm...@openwrt.org wrote:
> Author: blogic
> Date: 2015-09-16 14:08:05 +0200 (Wed, 16 Sep 2015)
> New Revision: 46981
> 
> Modified:
>    trunk/target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/652-atm_header_changes.patch
> Log:
> kernel: properly guard the lantiq atm abi hack with an ifdef

Would not it make sense to move this to target/linux/lantiq now that
this is target-specific?

> 
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blo...@openwrt.org>
> 
> Modified: trunk/target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/652-atm_header_changes.patch
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/652-atm_header_changes.patch      
> 2015-09-16 09:37:39 UTC (rev 46980)
> +++ trunk/target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/652-atm_header_changes.patch      
> 2015-09-16 12:08:05 UTC (rev 46981)
> @@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
>  --- a/include/uapi/linux/atm.h
>  +++ b/include/uapi/linux/atm.h
> -@@ -154,6 +154,9 @@
> +@@ -154,6 +154,11 @@
>       unsigned int adtf      :10;     /* ACR Decrease Time Factor (10-bit) */
>       unsigned int cdf       :3;      /* Cutoff Decrease Factor (3-bit) */
>           unsigned int spare     :9;      /* spare bits */ 
> ++#ifdef CONFIG_LANTIQ
>  +    int             scr;            /* sustained rate in cells per second */
>  +    int             mbs;            /* maximum burst size (MBS) in cells */
>  +    int             cdv;            /* Cell delay varition */
> ++#endif
>   };
>   
>   struct atm_qos {
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-commits mailing list
> openwrt-comm...@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-commits
> 
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to