Hi John, On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 14:25 +0200, John Crispin wrote: > > On 27/08/2015 14:15, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 13:59 +0200, John Crispin wrote: > > > Hi Alexey, > > > > > > have you already sent these patches upstream to the gcc people ? > > > > I'm not really sure which patches you're talking about. > > > > If you're talking about patches I put in "toolchain/gcc/patches/arc-2015.06" > > folder those are selected [mostly arch-independent] ones from > > "toolchain/gcc/patches/4.8-linaro". > > > > If you're talking about patches for GCC/binutils with support of ARC > > then we're actively working on upstreaming both projects. > > > > Moreover initial support of ARC is already in upstream GCC but that lacks > > many > > recent improvements. We're looking forward to get all our work upstream in > > coming > > months. > > > > Hope I answered your question. Otherwise please feel free to clarify your > > question and I'll answer it then. > > > > -Alexey > > > > great, i just wanted to make sure that you are aware of the real > upstream :) would hate to see patches bit rot in our tree
Well our position is we're working toward upstreaming. Moreover we used to develop project on our GitHub and then submit things upstream. But now when we have more experience and lots of stuff made its way upstream we attempt to work literally upstream. Partially having maintainer's repositories in upstream projects partially sending patches right away. I mean I have no copy of OpenWRT tree on GitHub. I'm sending you guys everything once I have anything to send :) -Alexey _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
