On 2015-08-21 16:23, Rich Felker wrote:
>> 2. patch patch-kernel.sh
>>
>> ---
>> --- a/scripts/patch-kernel.sh
>> +++ b/scripts/patch-kernel.sh
>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ for i in ${patchdir}/${patchpattern} ; do
>> [ -d "${i}" ] && echo "Ignoring subdirectory ${i}" && continue
>> echo ""
>> echo "Applying ${i} using ${type}: "
>> - ${uncomp} ${i} | ${PATCH:-patch} -f -p1 -E -d ${targetdir}
>> + ${uncomp} ${i} | ${PATCH:-patch} -f -p1 -d ${targetdir}
>> if [ $? != 0 ] ; then
>> echo "Patch failed! Please fix $i!"
>> exit 1
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Does anyone have any preferences? I'm opting for "patch patch-kernel"
>> (and I will send a proper patch next week to OpenWRT even if no one
>> cares now :-D )
>
> This seems like a better approach to me, but I don't know if it would
> adversely affect the kernel or other components.
Applied this change in r46723 - I don't expect any side effects in the
kernel or other components, since this flag seems to be relevant for
non-standard patch formats only, and we usually keep our patches consistent.
- Felix
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
