Sven,
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 19:10 +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <s...@open-mesh.com>
> ---
> v2: Rebased to fix conflict with r46207
>
> ...79-add-gpio-func-register-for-QCA955x-SoC.patch | 60
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> ...79-add-gpio-func-register-for-QCA955x-SoC.patch | 60
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> target/linux/ar71xx/patches-3.18/739-MIPS-ath79-add-gpio-func-register-for-QCA955x-SoC.patch
> create mode 100644
> target/linux/ar71xx/patches-4.1/739-MIPS-ath79-add-gpio-func-register-for-QCA955x-SoC.patch
>
<snip>
> ++ reg_base = AR934X_GPIO_REG_OUT_FUNC0;
> ++ } else if (soc_is_qca953x()) {
> ++ reg_base = QCA953X_GPIO_COUNT;
^^^^^^^^
> ++ reg_base = QCA953X_GPIO_REG_OUT_FUNC0;
> ++ } else if (soc_is_qca955x()) {
> ++ gpio_count = QCA955X_GPIO_COUNT;
> ++ reg_base = QCA955X_GPIO_REG_OUT_FUNC0;
> ++ } else {
> ++ BUG();
<snip>
This patch gives me a compile error when building Netgear/wndr3700
claiming that gpio_base is possibly undefined.
Should the above to be gpio_base and not reg_base?
Steve
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
