-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What prereq can be forced that makes force even a worthwhile option? If it works anyway, why not just drop the prereq check? If it still won't work, what's the point in allowing a force?
Cheers, Karl P Lawrence D'Anna <la...@elder-gods.org> wrote: > If the build prereq checks fail, you get the message > > Prerequisite check failed. Use FORCE=1 to override. > > But re-trying with "make menuconfig FORCE=1" gives you the same result. > > This patch fixes that. > > Signed-off-by: Lawrence D'Anna <la...@elder-gods.org> > --- > include/prereq.mk | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/prereq.mk b/include/prereq.mk > index 33ac278..770dafd 100644 > --- a/include/prereq.mk > +++ b/include/prereq.mk > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ prereq: > cat $(TMP_DIR)/.prereq-error; \ > rm -f $(TMP_DIR)/.prereq-error; \ > echo; \ > - false; \ > + $(if $(FORCE),true,false); \ > fi > > .SILENT: prereq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVrRUxAAoJEBmotQ/U1cr2oB0QAL71YhXlaq/USVumEfaTqsUI ei2rBms4cVf7edreOvMKUBLIZ6mPgITcRJqtvgxxwhhbTYYoliDPiiLZ7EX2WqV5 IrwLV5EEwe2RK64vYxyvXujSvNepDqTo7UhqB2mNMMy6fGuSJRWD9QfIlS8z9BuL rhZfPpGGI9SovJNUhtz96y7mxFR+L7Wk7hh/DG93q0t/CpaQRsRBsSEDCpBzkENF UN/X/hK8mGoXcC8GLdtWXujigDUL5CQaZCdBvpFhuboimHp/Q1RoSmtLcnkqc2xb rUKJoMFRhC9BaoJpDsrcgs5AP1g5OzbaSelNkDL57IBfd8lxX9Yk7hSd4o5vmUp/ M99V6qVt81SIB9DRuJzejutEtObbjNFmLX2WohQSaUSs5FzRZL1Vk2uVrslqZKR7 pFnDpAAubVQhFm2Oz+aNKeRMCXgccBFcyvDzSOvhyDq9Wh5U0FeS9uFooESVpvrA vdMvTJxWXQBkw2hdUoqfLedFAsyPpOb9eDFl3eiZ0FrOJCoaBl5iByKzWcxdjIWW CpIEKcaUE4JjpC8vTSVF0st+ER8me50+790B3avZjPZxmzRdy/p0UpnY0FgJOfM+ w/TB3YTVNmu8v4ssQD2xqcNBbQxp49nZYSob6yG1o6qhVJnbE1AxwBoaNAjDxOT9 I3Ds5dUQS4wD7AZh7WNh =S04b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
