On 31 March 2015 at 00:10, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was little bit surprised it's not so currently. > Although I understand that, potentially, there are use cases when you > want port pvid to be different from it's untagged vlan id, but usually > one wants port ingress traffic to fall into the same vlan as it's > untagged egress traffic. Even more, current luci interface ignores > 'switch_port' section of /etc/config/network making it impossible to > change pvid from web ui. > Also if one creates a new vlan most likely he will need a new > interface (e.g. eth0.10 for vlan 10). This is not obvious for a > "regular" user. > > I think it would be much better if netifd (or whoever does it) would > at least set pvid to vid value for untagged ports in same vlan group. > I can try doing it myself if somebody can give me the pointers to > where the changes should go. > > Did I overlook something? Are there other/better options? >
Forgot to mention that I test it on mt7620 Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
