On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Dirk Neukirchen <dirkneukirc...@web.de>
wrote:
> Its probably a good thing to get easier access to a uclibc variant than
> using
> - "abandoned" eglibc = bad ("EGLIBC is no longer developed and such goals
> are now being addressed directly in GLIBC. ")
>
By the way, I've also been working on a patch to re-introduce glibc. I'll
send that through soon. :-)
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
