On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Sławomir Demeszko <s.demes...@wireless-instruments.com> wrote: [snip] > I just tested and found that also a dot in filenames can be a problem. For > example if we would have "some.file.so" then it matches also "some2file.so" > and it could not detect missing dependency. So -qxF is a more than bit > better.
Perhaps you can update your patch then so that it applies cleanly to master? I cannot apply it, but you'll have a better chance of getting it accepted if it applies cleanly. :-) You'll also need to sign off on it. The Submitted Patches details what they look for: <https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/SubmittingPatches> Section 10 talks about the sign off. -John _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
