We've been carrying around that patch for a while now and didn't
ever encounter any problem on non-UBI flashtypes. So I guess the
8kB extra space won't hurt on modern platforms which might even make
use of their U-Boot environment being stored in UBI.
Let me know if there are any targets missing in the blacklist
(i.e. platforms/SoCs without the option to deploy NAND flash or
commonly found with only 4MB flash where those 8kB might actually
matter, or platforms where we haven't got U-Boot, ...)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <dan...@makrotopia.org>
---
package/boot/uboot-envtools/Config.in | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/boot/uboot-envtools/Config.in
b/package/boot/uboot-envtools/Config.in
index 9fd8103..10c03f9 100644
--- a/package/boot/uboot-envtools/Config.in
+++ b/package/boot/uboot-envtools/Config.in
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
config UBOOT_ENVTOOLS_UBI
bool "Support environment in UBI volume"
depends on PACKAGE_uboot-envtools
- default n
+ depends on !TARGET_adm5120 && !TARGET_adm8668 && !TARGET_ar7 && \
+ !TARGET_ar71xx_generic && !TARGET_atheros && \
+ !TARGET_au1000 && !TARGET_avr32 && !TARGET_ramips_rt288x && \
+ !TARGET_ramips_rt305x && !TARGET_uml && !TARGET_x86 && \
+ !TARGET_x86_64
+
+ default y
help
Add support for reading and writing U-Boot environment
stored in UBI volume(s).
--
2.1.3
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
