Hi Florian,

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:42:25PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 18/11/2014 02:27, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> > Hi Felix,
> > 
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:54:15AM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >> On 2014-11-07 11:58, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> Rely on the Kconfig defconfig mechanism to fill all the missing options,
> >>> instead of needing to set them all in the kernel configurations like what 
> >>> was
> >>> previously done.
> >>>
> >>> This will allow to trim down a lot the configuration files, avoid carrying
> >>> unused configuration options and preserve the developpers mental health.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
> >> I think this is a very good idea. Did you verify on all relevant
> >> architectures that the resulting kernel config stays the same with this
> >> change?
> > 
> > I've given a test-run on all the supported architectures, both with
> > and without the patch.
> > 
> > It pointed out that there was an incorrect assumption on my side that
> > $(ARCH) would be the Linux architecture, which it isn't. A second
> > version will follow shortly to address this.
> 
> I have not seen a v2 patchset which addresses that? Thanks!

Sorry for the delay, I just sent it.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to