Am Montag, 3. November 2014, 10:58:20 schrieb John Crispin: > turns out that this adds duplicate info. i think someone needs to go > over this with a fine comb before we merge it. >
Arghh ... you are right, overlooked this totally. Will clean up and re-post. Sorry for the noise, Michael > John > > On 02/11/2014 20:54, Michael Heimpold wrote: > > Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not > > clearly state their licenses, and often multiple source files are > > simply copied together - each with different licensing information > > in the file headers. > > > > I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into > > the OpenWRT's makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such > > small packages which come without a dedicated source archive > > "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license in my opinion. > > > > However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct > > information and/or did not miss license information. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <m...@heimpold.de> --- > > > > Hi, > > > > this is a rebased version of the patch I sent in June, see > > http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/5636 > > > > Changes can also be pulled from > > https://github.com/mhei/openwrt/tree/spdx > > > > Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
