Hi, On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Hannu Nyman <hannu.ny...@iki.fi> wrote: > Dave Taht wrote on Thu Oct 2 03:49:15 CEST 2014: >> So I don't know where to go. Certainly I'd like to see the battle hardened >> sqm scripts (which are more flexible than the C code above) get more widely >> used and in BB. > > SQM seems to work ok with the current Chaos Calmer trunk.
Works for mee too, and performs much better than the old luci-app-qos. I would love to see this as part of OpenWrt. I did some RRUL test using netperf-wrapper on my ADSL 15/1Mbps PPPoE link and it looks good in the graphs. I also have an 6in4 tunnel inside PPPoE and IIRC fq_codel should detect these ipv6 flows. RRUL looks good at IPv6. Had this running at home for some days now, with moderate traffic and no issues so far. But I was wondering which interface to select luci-app-sqm, as no tunnel intefaces are shown here. So i used the ethernet interface instead of the PPPoE link. Is this fine? Minutes ago, I did a quick test and applied SQM to the PPPoE link by fixing luci-base to return also the virtual interfaces in net:get_interfaces(). But i didn't notice any difference or my test was too sloppy. -- Stephan _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
