On 21 August 2014 06:45, Forest Crossman <cyro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Forest Crossman <cyro...@gmail.com>
> ---
> target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 4 ++--
> target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 8 ++++----
> target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-eap300v2.c | 6 +++---
> target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-esr900.c | 10 +++++-----
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
> b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
> index 1864b11..0401b93 100755
> --- a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
> +++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ get_status_led() {
> status_led="d-link:amber:power"
> ;;
> eap300v2)
> - status_led="engenius:blue:power"
> + status_led="eap300v2:blue:power"
> ;;
Taking those buffalo, d-link and other routers as examples, I thought
the convention for naming leds should be `$brand:$color:$function".
yousong
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
