Hi Karl,
On July 17, 2014 11:40:52 PM CEST, Karl P <ka...@tweak.net.au> wrote:
>
>
>On 07/17/2014 08:26 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> I argue that people unable to change the router settings are
>better of with all unsolicited inbound traffic disabled.
>
>I've tried to avoid weighing in on this, but I'd argue that you're
>wrong :)
>Making sure that people can _never_ have services in the future, just
>because
>they never had them in the past is a terrible way to live.
It seems I was not clear enough: what I meant is: if one can not be added
to expose a host IP and port range in one's router than maybe one does not
really need the inbound connection to begin with. All that "people" in my
statement need to do is google how to open the ports, not exactly rocket
science, is it? People incompetent enough to not being able to open the ports
on the router are unlikely to keep all their devices perfectly safe and updated
(as if that is enough, given zero-day exploits, but I digress). Really, I do
wonder how easy we want to make an attacker's job here ;)
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
>Sincerely,
>Karl Palsson
>_______________________________________________
>openwrt-devel mailing list
>openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
