On 01/07/2014 22:12, Ben Mulvihill wrote: > Hello again, > > I have just tried sysupgradeNAND on the BTHOMEHUBV2B, and it fails > with the following error: > > > cat: can't open '/tmp/sysinfo/board_name': No such file or > directory Unlocking kernel ... > > Writing from <stdin> to kernel ... [ ]tar: sysupgrade-/kernel: > not found in archive > > > Procd relies on /tmp/sysinfo/board_name being present, but I don't > have a /tmp/sysinfo directory at all. Should I have? If so, should > I add code to lib/functions/lantiq.sh to generate > /tmp/sysinfo/board_name using lantiq_board_id() ? And if so, what > do I hook it to to make sure it gets executed? > > Thanks, > > Ben > >
ermm yes ... it should work the same as on imx6, ramips, ar71xx ... you can either do this tonight or i can do it in the morning. which ever you prefer :) > > On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 20:44 +0200, John Crispin wrote: >> i renamed the api after r41131, so make sure to use the correct >> one. >> >> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh?rev=41222#L308 >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/06/2014 20:40, John Crispin wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/06/2014 20:32, Ben Mulvihill wrote: >>>> Great. Unless Daniel has any objections, I'll re-submit it >>>> properly ( - Patchwork didn't pick this one up). It didn't >>>> break the BTHOMEHUBV2B, but it would be good if someone could >>>> test it on the other boards too. >>>> >>>> The one thing that is still missing is sysupgrade support. >>>> >>>> Ben >>> >>> i have not spoken with daniel but i am sure he is fine with >>> this patch >>> >>> is the kernel located on the same nand .. i recall that the >>> unit had a nor flash aswell. >>> >>> look at the patch i added for the wndr4300 to make sysupgrade >>> work. the homehub should work the same way i believe >>> >>> https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/41131/ >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 14:43 +0200, John Crispin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 30/06/2014 13:40, Ben Mulvihill wrote: >>>>>> Hello Daniel and John, >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you have a look at this patch, and let me know if >>>>>> this is the best approach? I have defined new make >>>>>> targets for lantiq called Image/BuildNAND/squashfs and >>>>>> Image/BuildNAND/ubifs, making use of the UbinizeImage >>>>>> machanism. For the moment, I only enable them for the >>>>>> BTHOMEHUBV2B, because that is the only lantiq board I >>>>>> have to test, but I don't see any reason why they >>>>>> couldn't be used for the EASY80920NAND and the P2812HNUFX >>>>>> too. As far as I can see, that only leaves one more >>>>>> lantiq nand board, the FRITZ3370, which has a dedicated >>>>>> make target. Once that has been modified as well the make >>>>>> targets Image/Build/ubifs and Image/Build/ubi can be >>>>>> removed from target/linux/lantiq/image/Makefile. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ben >>>>> >>>>> in general there are no guidelines to this stuff. every >>>>> target maintainer sort of has his own pattern for the >>>>> image/Makefile. some patterns have proven to be good and >>>>> get reused etc etc. >>>>> >>>>> that being said, i know felix is planning to globally >>>>> rework the image generation in owrt and unify it between >>>>> all targets. so, if your patch works and causes no >>>>> regression i am happy to take it. it looks good and i think >>>>> i would have come up with a similar patch >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Mulvihill <ben.mulvih...@gmail.com> >>>>>> --- --- a/target/linux/lantiq/image/Makefile 2014-06-30 >>>>>> 11:49:59.562213352 +0200 +++ >>>>>> b/target/linux/lantiq/image/Makefile 2014-06-30 >>>>>> 11:54:07.211979129 +0200 @@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ define >>>>>> Image/Build/squashfs $(if $(3),$(call >>>>>> MkBrnImage,$(3),$(4), >>>>>> $(BIN_DIR)/$(IMG_PREFIX)-$(2)-$(3)-brnImage,$(2),$(1),$(5))) >>>>>> endef >>>>>> >>>>>> +define Image/BuildNAND/squashfs + +ifneq >>>>>> ($($(PROFILE)_UBI_OPTS),) + $(call >>>>>> prepare_generic_squashfs,$(KDIR)/root.$(1)) + $(call >>>>>> Image/Build/UbinizeImage,$(PROFILE),,squashfs, >>>>>> $($(PROFILE)_UBI_OPTS)) +endif +endef + >>>>>> DGN3500_SKERNEL=0x50000 DGN3500_SKERNEL_DECIMAL=327680 >>>>>> define Image/BuildDGN3500/squashfs @@ -185,6 +193,17 @@ >>>>>> ifneq ($($(PROFILE)_UBI_OPTS),) endif endef >>>>>> >>>>>> + +define Image/BuildNAND/ubifs + +ifneq >>>>>> ($($(PROFILE)_UBIFS_OPTS),) +ifneq >>>>>> ($($(PROFILE)_UBI_OPTS),) + $(call >>>>>> Image/Build/UbinizeImage,$(PROFILE),,ubifs, >>>>>> $($(PROFILE)_UBI_OPTS)) +endif +endif +endef + + define >>>>>> Image/InstallKernel/Template >>>>>> >>>>>> ifneq ($(CONFIG_TARGET_ROOTFS_INCLUDE_KERNEL),) @@ -293,7 >>>>>> +312,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_TARGET_lantiq_xway),y) >>>>>> >>>>>> # Danube Image/BuildKernel/Profile/BTHOMEHUBV2B=$(call >>>>>> Image/BuildKernel/Template,BTHOMEHUBV2B) >>>>>> -Image/Build/Profile/BTHOMEHUBV2B=$(call >>>>>> Image/Build/$(1), $(1),BTHOMEHUBV2B) >>>>>> +Image/Build/Profile/BTHOMEHUBV2B=$(call >>>>>> Image/BuildNAND/$(1), $(1),BTHOMEHUBV2B) >>>>>> >>>>>> Image/BuildKernel/Profile/EASY50712=$(call >>>>>> Image/BuildKernel/Template,EASY50712) >>>>>> Image/Build/Profile/EASY50712=$(call >>>>>> Image/Build/$(1),$(1),EASY50712) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel >>>> mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel >>> mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
