On 1 July 2014 13:31, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > > > On 30/06/2014 19:34, Roman Yeryomin wrote: >> This adds support for mt7620 SoC. Tested with Asus RT-N14U only. >> >> Thanks to everybody who participated in this effort. Epecially Miko >> Hissa and Сергей Василюгин. >> > > Hi, > > confirmed working and pushed to trunk. > > tested on mt7620a/n. i tested on 2 eval kits and 4 buffalo routers. > > for me all have functional ethernet even without the vid patch. > > nonetheless we should make the vid = vlan nr thing explicit and default > > i have a recollection, that the eep layout is different on mt7620 and > i don't see that code being patched. so we need to look into that > > i am also missing the lna/pna fixes, we should add those as well, > similar to how rt3352 does it. > > those nitpicks set aside, we have working wifi on mt7620x !!! :) > > thanks again to all involved, i think we will have the final cleanups > in trunk soon, now that we have packet flow. > > John > > > PS: just tested whr-1166 and get this, telling me the eeprom code > needs a bit more love. i can still assoc though and am sending this > mail via the whr-1166 > > [ 26.430000] WARNING: at > /openwrt/trunk/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kec+dsp_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-ramips_mt7620a/compat-wireless-2014-05-22/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c:408 > rt2800_vco_calibration+0x2d8/0x3d4 [rt2800lib]() > [ 26.470000] phy0: invalid EEPROM word 208 > [ 26.480000] Modules linked in: rt2800soc rt2800pci rt2800mmio > ....
I think there is still a lot of work to do. But yes, I'm using my asus board all the day and it seems pretty stable. Although I didn't try extracting eeprom from the board itself yet (I'm using the one from original driver). Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
