2014-05-09 12:13 GMT+02:00, Álvaro Fernández Rojas <nolt...@gmail.com>: > Thanks for the help Pteridium. BTW, dmidecode is only available for x86, not > for x86_64: > https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/utils/dmidecode/Makefile -> > DEPENDS:=@TARGET_x86 > Yes an no: dmidecode was added before the inclusion of target x86_64. According to the developers web page it works in 64bit machines and OSs: http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/ Unless i'm wrong the dmidecode makefile should be updated too; the last change was in r25602
> @Luka: If you have any other suggestions or changes just tell me. > > P.S: Maybe we should completely remove dmidecode dependency, since it > disables flashrom for any other targets (without this patch), and let the > user select it if he wants that functionality. > > Álvaro > I think is dangerous if the dmidecode dependency is totally removed in flashrom but i can be wrong. Pepe > El 09/05/2014 10:51, Luka Perkov escribió: >> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:44:38AM +0200, José Vázquez wrote: >>> Sure? maybe i am a bit blind. :( >> >> You are not - I've missed it... Thanks. I guess it was too early in the >> morning :) >> >> Luka >> >>> V1: >>> Eliminated: DEPENDS:=+zlib +pciutils +dmidecode +libftdi >>> +libusb-compat @(arm||armeb||i386||i686||x86_64) >>> Added: DEPENDS:=+zlib +pciutils +dmidecode +libftdi +libusb-compat >>> V2: >>> Eliminated: DEPENDS:=+zlib +pciutils +dmidecode +libftdi >>> +libusb-compat @(arm||armeb||i386||i686||x86_64) >>> Added: DEPENDS:=+zlib +pciutils +TARGET_x86:dmidecode +libftdi >>> +libusb-compat >>> >>> Pepe >>> >>> 2014-05-09 10:34 GMT+02:00, Luka Perkov <l...@openwrt.org>: >>>> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:28:50AM +0200, José Vázquez wrote: >>>>> 2014-05-09 8:32 GMT+02:00, Luka Perkov <l...@openwrt.org>: >>>>>> Hi Alvaro, >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see this change. Patch v2 is same as v1. >>>>>> >>>>>> Luka >>>>>> >>>>> In v1 he eliminated cpu dependencies while in v2 dmidecode is only >>>>> selected by TARGET_x86. >>>>> I think that, in addition to x86 should be added x86_64 and any other >>>>> target that has dmi. >>>> >>>> Yes, it says that in the description but the patches are the same. >>>> >>>> Luka >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
