On Monday 17 February 2014 05:57:25 Kalle Valo wrote: > Sven Eckelmann <s...@open-mesh.com> writes: > > The ath10k patch wasn't resent because the driver patches are now > > integrated in the OpenWrt mac80211 package. The answer in > > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.embedded.openwrt.devel/22422 also > > wasn't> > > quite promising. > > What do you mean? What was wrong with my answer?
Nothing is "wrong" but you said that there are two branches. One is "AP mode,
nothing else" and the other one is "main branch again has more
features, like P2P, ...". So I don't see a good reason why a multi-purpose
system like openwrt should accept my patch to change it to the "AP-only"
ath10k firmware.
This is the only reason why I've dropped this patch.
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
