Dear friends still i can not udjust 3 clients DL UL speeds one by one
for example
client1 jhon has IP 192.168.1.5 and his download speed is 1 mb/ps upload
speed is 1 mb/ps
client2 emma has IP 192.168.1.6 and her download speed is 3 mb/ps upload
speed is 2 mb/ps
please any one help me to do it this by sending script to do it and
prerequisite packages to install on openwrt
oguz ersoz
----- Original Message -----
From: <openwrt-devel-requ...@lists.openwrt.org>
To: <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 1:00 PM
Subject: openwrt-devel Digest, Vol 94, Issue 55
Send openwrt-devel mailing list submissions to
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
openwrt-devel-requ...@lists.openwrt.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
openwrt-devel-ow...@lists.openwrt.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of openwrt-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Add a new Amazon-SE board (James Hilliard)
2. Re: dslite interface not getting active (Steven Barth)
3. Re: OpenWRT on Ubicom Chipsets (James Hilliard)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:54:06 -0500
From: James Hilliard <james.hillia...@gmail.com>
To: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
Message-ID:
<cadvtj4qq4gjmghjhgqcqpwen9sugp1qbe6o+_ongmxkggnk...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Ok, i'm going to contact the manufacturer directly then and see what they
say.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Marco Antonio Mauro
<marcu...@gmail.com>wrote:
On Oct 18, 2013 1:00 PM, "James Hilliard" <james.hillia...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Does the software appear to be customized at all for the ISP or does it
seem to be generic?
I'm not home at the moment so I cannot grab you some screenshots, but the
interface is exactly the same as the one here taken from my ISP's
website:
http://assistenza.tiscali.it/tecnica/adsl/configurazioni/thomson_tg585v8/configurazione_modem/1.php
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20131018/1f924897/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:53:50 +0200
From: Steven Barth <cy...@openwrt.org>
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dslite interface not getting active
Message-ID: <5262489e.6020...@openwrt.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello Hans,
I finally commited a netifd update yesterday which should take care of
that.
Regards,
Steven
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 04:04:10 -0500
From: James Hilliard <james.hillia...@gmail.com>
To: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT on Ubicom Chipsets
Message-ID:
<cadvtj4oh47o3oooq7oz4izsnzntu9fk_7-woxasl4wyvhqk...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I've now based off of trunk and have integrated some actual hardware
specific configs/patches, I've made progress on a number of other needed
changes but am stuck on one particular error :
ERROR: Missing site config for target "ubicom32-openwrt-linux-uclibc" !
The missing file will cause configure scripts to fail during
compilation.
Please provide a
"/home/james/openwrt/include/site/ubicom32-openwrt-linux-uclibc" file and
restart the build.
make[2]: *** [prereq] Error 1
make[1]: *** [prereq] Error 2
make: *** [depends] Error 2
I have no idea what configure scripts actually need this and how to fix
it.
It does not exist in the oem ubicom buildroot directory as far as I can
tell so I think I just need to kill off whatever is asking for the file
since it is probably not needed there.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:15 AM, James Hilliard
<james.hillia...@gmail.com>wrote:
Do I need to submit everything all at once or can I add things slowly so
I
can confirm all components are in compliance with openwrt formatting etc?
The first thing to do would be to revert the removal of the ubicom32
platform here https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/ubicom32, from there I can
work on integrating the device specific patches. Should I submit a patch
for that removal?
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:50 AM, James Hilliard
<james.hillia...@gmail.com
> wrote:
So, I think i more or less got the boot processes down, however I don't
have hardware with me right now. Boot goes from ultra>uboot>linux more
or
less. From the looks of it getting a console on uboot should be fairly
straight forward. I'm going to attempt to compile an oem build with the
uboot console enabled that way we can debug and flash over Ethernet
instead
of serial. Msg me on gtalk and ill send you some builds(this email).
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:04 AM, michal-osowie...@o2.pl <
michal-osowie...@o2.pl> wrote:
Hi James
AFAIR dir-657 soucecode has openwrt's port which compiles but has no
ethernet switch enabled/ported. I's hard to test develop anything
without
flash programmer so i dropped testing. It would be nice if you could
add
this model to your work
Thanks,
Michal
Dnia 16 pa?dziernika 2013 20:53 James Hilliard <
james.hillia...@gmail.com> napisa?(a):
> I think i'll attempt to support this and get some
vendor/deviceconfigs integrated, can the changes that removed arch
support
bereverted easily in trunk? I've been working off of 12.09 here
https://github.com/Lightsword1942/openwrtubicom and manually merging
some things let me know if you have anysuggestions. I'm not sure
what
this is using for include/siteand that's what I'm currently
hung up
on.
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Florian Fainelli <
f.faine...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 2013/9/16 James Hilliard <james.hillia...@gmail.com>:
> > Anyone interested in OpenWRT on Ubicom? They used OpenWRTinternally
so
> > there is already source ready(may be a little outdatedthough). Also
have
> > some router specific sources of both it and stock.
> OpenWrt did "support" the ubicom32 architecture for awhile, but since
> this is a very quirky architecture and nobody could step up as a
> maintainer, it got removed. Unless you are willing to support that
> architecture, I see no point in supporting it since it reallyrequired
> a lot of quirks (special "hypervisor" software,bootloader and !MMU).
> --
> Florian
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20131019/f2814bed/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
------------------------------
End of openwrt-devel Digest, Vol 94, Issue 55
*********************************************
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
