On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 01:30:07 -0700 Nathan Hintz <nlhi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:51:23 +0200 > Steven Barth <cy...@openwrt.org> wrote: > > > Hi Nathan, > > > > actually it's not that easy. Especially if the contents are the same > > this means an update. This is because most contents of the RA contain a > > validity timer in seconds. > > > > Thus if you sent 2 successive RAs with the same contents with a 3 second > > difference the second RA increases the validity of the contents by 3 > > seconds (as it arrived 3 seconds later). > > > > Cheers, > > > > Steven > > _______________________________________________ > > openwrt-devel mailing list > > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > > True, but does it need to be passed on to netifd? Depends on who > maintains/monitors the validity timers I guess. > Does the interface need to be torn down and rebuilt just for a validity timer update (barring the case when the update makes it go invalid)? -- Nathan _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
