Hi, Am Mittwoch, 14. August 2013, 22:41:07 schrieb Hartmut Knaack: > Now I see. IMHO sending a [PATCH V2] would be the cleaner solution.
+1 > > Oliver Ertl schrieb: > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Ertl <oli...@ertls-netzwerk.de> > > --- > > rules.mk | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/rules.mk b/rules.mk > > index 2d4d5c8..8594ca6 100644 > > --- a/rules.mk > > +++ b/rules.mk > > @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ ifdef CONFIG_MIPS64_ABI > > endif > > > > DL_DIR:=$(if $(call qstrip,$(CONFIG_DOWNLOAD_FOLDER)),$(call > > qstrip,$(CONFIG_DOWNLOAD_FOLDER)),$(TOPDIR)/dl) > > -DL_DIR:=$(if $(call qstrip,$(CONFIG_BINARY_FOLDER)),$(call > > qstrip,$(CONFIG_BINARY_FOLDER)),$(TOPDIR)/bin/$(BOARD)) I guess this is still wrong or should both patches be applied in order? Then this should be a series, please resubmit. BTW: could you explain your intension a little bit in the commit message? I wondering what a use case of this patch would be... > > +BIN_DIR:=$(if $(call qstrip,$(CONFIG_BINARY_FOLDER)),$(call > > qstrip,$(CONFIG_BINARY_FOLDER)),$(TOPDIR)/bin/$(BOARD)) > > INCLUDE_DIR:=$(TOPDIR)/include > > SCRIPT_DIR:=$(TOPDIR)/scripts > > BUILD_DIR_BASE:=$(TOPDIR)/build_dir > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
