Dnia 2013-01-09, o godz. 20:51:04 Paul Fertser <fercer...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> Cezary Jackiewicz <cezary.jackiew...@gmail.com> writes: > > +define Profile/3G300M > > + NAME:=Tenda 3G300M > > + PACKAGES:=\ > > + kmod-usb-core kmod-usb-rt305x-dwc_otg \ > > + kmod-ledtrig-usbdev > > +endef > > What is the motivation to have a dedicated profile that's exactly the > same as the default one? To can be selected only this device. [...] > Can you please take a look at http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/3132/ > , do you know of any reason do not do it the same way here? Because your patch is not yet included into mainline? This is patch for current sources, if anyone enters this change, it may be rewritten. > BTW, do you think kernel_size_4M and rootfs_size_4M should be defined > and used for all the mtdlayout_4M targets instead of hardcoding those > numbers? IMO yes, it should be, as generic_8m. -- Pozdrawiam, Cezary Jackiewicz _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
