On 2 September 2012 23:28, Tobias Diedrich <ranma+open...@tdiedrich.de> wrote:
> Use doubletagging to disable ramips_esw vlan by default, it seems
> more reliable.
>
> Daniel Golle found an issue where sometimes (possibly only for
> RT3352) the default vlan disable method (clearing en_vlan, untag,
> doubletag and putting all ports into vlan 0) doesn't work and the
> packets get sent out vlan-tagged with vlan 0.
>
> Instead switch to using the doubletagging method (allow doubletagged
> packets, put all ports into vlan 0 with untag enabled) by default.
>
> Unless someone figures out a way to really globally disable vlan for
> this switch, this seems like the best (most reliable) option.
>
> I did some tests regarding maximum packet size and did not see any
> difference between the two methods, both allow for slightly bigger packets
> than the ramips_main.c ethernet driver (ping stops going through
> above "ping -s 1472" (1514 bytes), on the switch packets are recv_good until
> "ping -s 1490", or about 1532 bytes).
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+open...@tdiedrich.de>
>
>
> Index: 
> openwrt-ralink-swconfig/target/linux/ramips/files/drivers/net/ethernet/ramips/ramips_esw.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 
> openwrt-ralink-swconfig.orig/target/linux/ramips/files/drivers/net/ethernet/ramips/ramips_esw.c
>      2012-09-02 22:15:49.770899684 +0200
> +++ 
> openwrt-ralink-swconfig/target/linux/ramips/files/drivers/net/ethernet/ramips/ramips_esw.c
>   2012-09-02 22:16:57.970994947 +0200
> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@
>                         untag     |= esw->ports[i].untag     << i;
>                         pvid       = esw->ports[i].pvid;
>                 } else {
> -                       int x = esw->alt_vlan_disable ? 1 : 0;
> +                       int x = esw->alt_vlan_disable ? 0 : 1;
>                         doubletag |= x << i;
>                         en_vlan   |= x << i;
>                         untag     |= x << i;
>

I think I've stumbled upon this issue more than 6 months ago. I've
sent patches for belkin board and I was using double tagging. Gabor
then tried to fix it but his patches didn't work for me.
Double tagging works perfectly though.
Belkin soc is 3052F.

Regards,
Roman
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to