Сергей Василюгин <vasilu...@yandex.ru> writes: > 19.07.2012, 02:33, "Paul Fertser" <fercer...@gmail.com>: >> Full functionality runtime tested, installation via the OEM firmware >> web-interface requires a follow-up patch. >> > It's great! But DIR300B_WPS_BLUE != DIR620_WPS_BLUE (I've both devices). May > be change > led names to abstact "dlink:wps:color1" "dlink:wps:color2"? Dir300B > has two-color wps led too.
Yeah, i've noticed that the "wps" led is of different colour on dir-620. But imho that doesn't matter much. If the consensus is that it does, well, i think it would still be cleaner to account for that in the dir-300-b1 machine file, without creating another one. Thanks for your attention! -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:fercer...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
