On 12-05-27 07:51 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2012-05-27 3:56 AM, Adam Gensler wrote: >> In other words, if you need QoS already, fq_codel won't eliminate that >> need. But, if you aren't running QoS already, fq_codel has some really >> great potential to keep things running smoothly under load, yes? Am I >> understanding fq_codel correctly? > Correct.
I wonder though, how many people are using QoS as a band-aid for bufferbloat. Anyone using QoS to keep their upstream bandwidth below their supposed available bandwidth (i.e. so that they create that fast->slow bottleneck so that they can control it) surely is. b.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
