Hi Cristian, Il 26 aprile 2012 15:57, Christian Gagneraud <ch...@techworks.ie> ha scritto: > Hi Claudio, > > I'm updating the few patches I have here, and will send them soon to the > list. > > There are 2 patches I would like your opinion. > > The first one concerns the uImage generation. In the target's Makefile the > uImage is generated without compression, and then only for the flexibility > board is copied over the rootfs. > Other boards use a separate MTD partition for the kernel, and needs a > compressed kernel. > So this first patch move the mkimage call inside the "if flexibility" and > fallback for the other boards to the already built (and compressed) image > found in the kernel built tree. > Do you have any issue with that?
That ok for me. Anyway we can also tag both the kernels, the compressed one can be called uzImage and the uncompressed one uImage. This will make the name more descriptive. > > The second one concerns the SPI CS pins, there's a patch that "hijack" the > SPI pins definition (805-free_some_portc_pins.patch), in my case this is not > wanted. Do you know which board requires this? Is this patch still needed > since you removed some boards recently? > Yes this patch is just an hack to free some port on a particular carrier of the netus. No mandatory at all. Feel free to remove it, I can always surround the SPI_CS definition with the proper machtype if nedded. Regards, Claudio _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
