btw is "VLAN hopping" no longer a potential security vuln? If it's still possible to encapsulate a forged vlan header to redirect packets maybe the docs should mention it here and there, otherwise you easily get the impression they're as safe as a physical switch.
Sorry if the issue's already been solved. -- p >Al 24/02/12 19:17, En/na Robert Ryan ha escrit: > >> I see eth0, eth0.1, eth0.2 devices but none of them appear to be functional. >> I would expect at least the WAN port to work without switch drivers but >> perhaps I'm mistaken. I can assign IPs and ping the local address but can't >> ping to/from any external devices. >> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. > >If the AR8316 is like the AR8216 (they use the same driver), it adds vlan >headers to incoming >packets, and the ethernet driver needs to be patched like this: > >https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/lantiq/patches/200-owrt-netif_receive_skb.patch > >Bye _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
